next up previous contents
Next: 9 Feasibility: SIS+XRT Up: ASCA Appendix E Previous: 7 SIS

8 Feasibility: GIS+XRT

8.1 Count Rate Limitations

8.1.1 Telemetry Limit

The maximum useable count rate of the GIS is limited by the telemetry capacity. The telemetry limit for each GIS mode and bit rate is tabulated in Table 8.1. The maximum observable source intensity is, of course, achieved with high bit rate, and it reduces by a factor of 1/8 with medium bit rate.

The maximum count rate in PH mode with high bit rate is 128 count stex2html_wrap_inline1736 for each GIS. Since 1 Crab tex2html_wrap_inline2008 500 count stex2html_wrap_inline1736 GIStex2html_wrap_inline1736, the maximum source intensity when only one source is in the GIS field of view (FOV) is tex2html_wrap_inline1776 250 mCrab using the two GIS.

In the PCAL mode, the maximum count rate with the high bit rate is 16 count stex2html_wrap_inline1736 GIStex2html_wrap_inline1736 or tex2html_wrap_inline1776 30 mCrab. In the MPC mode, sacrificing the time resolution, the telemetry limit is as much as 128 Crab, but, in practice, tex2html_wrap_inline1776 20 Crab is the maximum due to the dead time of the pre-amplifier.

8.2 Limitations of Imaging Observations

8.2.1 PSF

The GIS spatial resolution is much more limited than that of the SIS. The position resolution of GIS is determined by the statistics used by the position determination algorithm. The point spread function of the GIS alone is a Gaussian with FWHM tex2html_wrap_inline2024 mm (Figure 5.3d). Note that this is smaller than the XRT HPD (3' tex2html_wrap_inline2008 3 mm), but significantly larger than the sharp core of the XRT PSF. Consequently, the convolved PSF of the XRT+GIS becomes much broader than that of XRT alone, and the original detailed structures in the XRT image are smeared in the GIS image. Studying small structures on a scale tex2html_wrap_inline2030, which may be carried out with the SIS, will not possible with the GIS.

8.2.2 Useable field of view

See §6.5.3 for caveats concerning the useable field of view of the GIS.

8.3 Limitations of Timing Observations

Unlike the SIS, the GIS does not have intrinsic limitations which may impede observations down to the maximum time resolution. In PH mode, the moderate telemetry limit and a significant CPU deadtime ( 8 msec/event) makes estimating the Poisson noise level difficult for bright sources. Consequently, aperiodic time-variation studies of bright sources (e.g. QPO study) will not be suitable using PH mode data. However, GIS monitor data, for which the telemetry limit is 2048 cts/s/sensor and the time resolution is 0.125 sec (high bit-rate), may be used to investigate short term variations of bright sources. The deadtime of the monitor data is 25 micro-sec/event. Note that neither energy nor spatial resolution is available for the GIS monitor data.

Coherent timing studies (e.g. of pulsars, pulsar searches) are feasible with PH mode. The accuracy of the photon arrival time is limited by the time assignment of the satellite, which is believed to be correct down to a few tens of msec.

8.3.1 Choice of GIS bit assignment

In GIS PH mode, each event is specified by 32 bits, one of which is used to identify the detector itself (GIS2 or GIS3). The rest specify the pulse height, X and Y coordinates, event rise-time, spread of UV light and timing. Allocation of these 31 bits can be programmed from the ground and can be specified by Guest observers. The default bit assignment is PH-X-Y-RT-SP-TIME=10-8-8-5-0-0. Hence, by default GIS PH mode data has 1024 pulse-height channels, tex2html_wrap_inline2032 spatial resolution, and 32 rise-time channels. The rise-time information is used for background rejection by Guest Observers in the data analysis stage. The UV-light spread information is diagnostic and not necessary for scientific purposes. In the default mode the time resolution is 62.5 msec for high bit rate, 8 times better than for medium bit rate. The number of timing bits can be increased up to 10, corresponding to a maximum resolution of tex2html_wrap_inline2034, by trading off information from other parts of the bit allocation. For example, by setting the bit-assignment as PH-X-Y-RT-SP-TIME=8-8-8-0-0-7, which may be appropriate for observations of fast rotating pulsars, the time resolution becomes 0.488 msec, and the number of pulse-height channels reduced to 256 and the rise-time information becomes unavailable.

8.4 Limitations of Spectral Observations

8.4.1 Pass band

The energy range over which the sensitivity of the GIS is more than 10 per cent of the maximum is 0.8-12 keV (Figure 8.4a). The lower end is mainly limited by absorption in the beryllium window, but the two mylar and aluminum windows (the XRT thermal shield and the GIS plasma shield) also contribute. The higher end is determined by the photoelectric absorption coefficient of the xenon gas. Off axis, the XRT+GIS effective area decreases due to telescope vignetting, but the efficiency of the GIS alone does not depend on incident X-ray position.

8.4.2 Energy resolution

The energy resolution of the GIS is about tex2html_wrap_inline1886 per cent (FWHM) and is shown in Figure 8.4b

8.4.3 Effect of deadtime

The deadtime effect does not alter the spectral distribution of the PH mode data so spectral study of bright sources is still feasible even if the data are telemetry saturated. The correct source flux can be deduced by applying the currently available deadtime corrections.

8.5 Detection Sensitivity (GIS & SIS)

The ultimate sensitivity of ASCA is set by the Poisson noise of source and background photons and by the confusion limit. For the former, particle background, truly diffuse cosmic X-ray background, unresolved background sources and the wings of resolved sources must be taken into account.The GIS internal background is tex2html_wrap_inline2038 count stex2html_wrap_inline1736 XRTtex2html_wrap_inline1736 HPD. The SIS internal background is less than this. As for X-ray background, even when individual sources can be resolved, significant power is contained in the very broad wings of the PSF where the contribution from these sources will effectively become a quasi-uniform background.

The estimate of extragalactic background of tex2html_wrap_inline177610tex2html_wrap_inline2046 ergcmtex2html_wrap_inline1730stex2html_wrap_inline1736keVtex2html_wrap_inline1736srtex2html_wrap_inline1736 corresponds to tex2html_wrap_inline2056 count stex2html_wrap_inline1736 over all four SIS CCDs and this is about what is observed in practice. For this GIS it is tex2html_wrap_inline17760.4 count stex2html_wrap_inline1736 if one takes a region 40 arcmin in diameter, excluding the edges with high internal background. Exposure times for, e.g., 5tex2html_wrap_inline1918 detection of sources, can be calculated using a uniform background. Figure 8.5 illustrates the required exposure times for a tex2html_wrap_inline2066 detection in the SIS for a background of 0.15 count stex2html_wrap_inline1736 (solid curve). For comparison, the corresponding curve for a background of 0.30 count stex2html_wrap_inline1736 is also shown (dashed).

An alternative view is to assume that all extragalactic background can ultimately be resolved into faint point sources. In this case, the sensitivity is set by the confusion limit. Assuming the tex2html_wrap_inline2072 relation by Piccinotti et al. (1982), the intensity at which only one source would be found in the XRT half power diameter (3 arcmin) is tex2html_wrap_inline2074 erg stex2html_wrap_inline1736 cmtex2html_wrap_inline1730. This roughly corresponds to 0.4 tex2html_wrap_inline1814Crab or tex2html_wrap_inline2082 count stex2html_wrap_inline1736 XRTtex2html_wrap_inline1736 HPD. Close to this flux level, source detection cannot be achieved with confidence.

Confusion limited observations will likely require too much time to be of interest to guest observers. Moreover, a 5tex2html_wrap_inline1918 detection will not allow any spectral analysis, which is the strength of ASCA.

Figure Captions


Figure 8.4a: The effective area of a single GIS combined with a single XRT for five off-axis angles (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 arcmin). The transmission of the XRT thermal shield of XRT and the plasma shield of the GIS--both are made of 0.5 tex2html_wrap_inline1814m mylar + 30 nm Al--is taken into account.


Figure 8.4b: The energy resolution of the GIS and SIS. The GIS resolution is believed to be stable; for the SIS, the estimated/extrapolated resolution of SIS-1 in 1-CCD mode is plotted for at launch and 1, 2, 3, 4 , 5 and 6 years after launch. SIS-0 resolution is degrading somewhat more slowly than that of SIS-1. In 2 and 4 CCD modes, the RDD effect further degrades the resolution somewhat.


Figure 8.5: 5tex2html_wrap_inline1918 detection limit of ASCA calculated assuming two different background rates, a PSF appropriate for the SIS, and circular detection cells whose size is optimized for the particular values of relative count rates. The bottom of the figure (10tex2html_wrap_inline2094 count stex2html_wrap_inline1736) is the source strength at which the predicted density is 1 per XRT HPD (using the Piccinotti tex2html_wrap_inline2098-tex2html_wrap_inline2100 relationship) . The average extragalactic background roughly corresponds to 0.15 count stex2html_wrap_inline1736 per SIS FOV, some of which will be resolvable into individual sources at long exposure times. The detection limits are broadly similar for SIS and GIS and depend sensitively on the precise nature of the cosmic X-ray background.

next up previous contents
Next: 9 Feasibility: SIS+XRT Up: ASCA Appendix E Previous: 7 SIS

Michael Arida
Tue May 13 19:54:56 EDT 1997