| RXTE GOF |
Dealing With Data Gaps: New RXTE Data Categories Recipes from the RXTE Cook Book |
RXTE FAQ |
|---|
- Introduction and Summary
- The Transponder Failure
- Categories of Data Gap
- New Naming Scheme for ObsIDs Affected by Gaps
- The Effects on Your Analysis
- Addendum: Attitude Errors, 2000 Sept 6-13
- 'Failed' Observations, and Reobservations
As a consequence of a transponder failure,
the GO data for RXTE observations performed since Sept 1st 1999 may include
obsID directory names marked with a G, C, or D. A G-designation
indicates on-source data that may suffer a gap in science,
housekeeping or attitude information of more than 10% of the total
predicted good time. C- and D-designations indicate a slew to or from
a source during which attitude information is not available, and thus
the exact limits of the slew are undefined. Note that only a very
small fraction of the data taken with RXTE currently suffers from such
problems.
The tools in our existing RXTE software package will process these
data transparently. The definition of Good Time Intervals (GTI,
included as an extension to each FITS file) has been amended to
only include intervals where attitude information is available.
Under certain circumstances, data outside these GTIs may be useful for
analysis.
Typical examples of data loss include the following: (i) satellite
attitude/position data may be missing, but the Std2 or user-selected
EDS mode data may still be usable for timing analysis. (In this case,
you may wish to get the most out of their data by disregarding the
given good time intervals, generating your own GTIs with less
stringent criteria, and reanalyzing portions of your data, accepting
the possibility that these data may have a less-reliable background
subtraction); (ii) Std2 data may be missing but the user-selected
EDS-mode data may contribute to your science goals; (iii) some HEXTE
data may be unavailable but the PCA data may be complete (or vice
versa).
This recipe describes the categories of data loss, the changes we have
made to the directory naming scheme to indicate that data loss may
have occurred, the compensatory changes to the GTI definition, and the
possible effects of all this on your RXTE data analysis. Familiarity
with the RXTE directory structure and 'conventional' RXTE data
analysis is a prerequisite for understanding the text that follows.
In addition, RXTE data obtained during the interval 2000 September
6-13 may include obsID directory names marked with a F, T, or U. These
designations indicate data that include errors in attitude
determination. (Note the important difference between missing
attitude data, as above, and attitude data that is present but
incorrect.) An Addendum to this recipe describes the problem and
the additional data categories in more detail.
On Sept 1st 1999, one of the two transponders on board RXTE suffered a
failure. As a result, only one of the two high gain antennas (HGA)
carried by RXTE can currently be used. Operational changes in the SOF
have succeeded in minimizing the effect of this transponder failure on
data capture. After a two-week adjustment period, the incidence of
data gaps has fallen dramatically, and many days may currently elapse
without a data loss of any kind. However, if you intend to analyze
data obtained after Sept 1st, 1999, you should be aware of the
information contained in this recipe.
Because of the way data are stored in RXTE's virtual recorders, a data
gap will generally affect certain types of RXTE data, leaving other
types intact. So far we've seen three main classes of data gap (some
of which can occur concurrently):
The GTIs supplied in the 2nd extension of your RXTE data files
will include ONLY those times
when attitude information is present (ApID 15), and RXTE is not in SAA
or Earth occult. These criteria are then folded in along with the
availability of the particular data you're analyzing - for example,
the GTIs supplied with the Good Xenon data will specify those times
when Good Xenon data are available AND the attitude criteria are met.
As a consequence, if you extract light curves and spectra
using the given GTIs -
i.e. using the default APPLY option at the 'gtiorfile' prompt when
using the RXTE SAEXTRCT or SEEXTRCT tools, times when ACS or science
data are missing will
automatically be excluded from your data products. The data in
Filter Files made using XTEFILT will be well-behaved in these regions,
and you can apply your usual data cleaning criteria.
Source Data
Data gaps are detected during the processing that creates the FITS
files. If an on-source observation suffers data gaps in any
ApIDs commonly used in data analysis (i.e. attitude data, PCA and
HEXTE housekeeping, all PCA Standard and Science modes, and
HEXTE Archive
and Science modes), totalling more than 10% of the expected good time
for the observation, that obsID is marked with a "G"; i.e. the obsID
for these data will become 40066-01-01-00G, rather than
40066-01-01-00. ObsIDs with a "G"-designation have some data
missing, although this may or may not affect your analysis goals.
ObsIDs without a "G"-designation can be assumed to be 90% complete or
better.
For long observations, where the data are split into more than one
obsID and data gaps total more than 10%, the letters "H" and "I" are
reserved for the continuation. Thus, 40066-01-01-00G may be followed
by obsIDs 40066-01-01-00H and 40066-01-01-00I. Because
of the logistics of scheduling, this will happen rarely.
Slew Data
Usually we mark a slew onto a
source with an "A" (e.g. 40066-01-01-00A), and the slew off-source
with a "Z" (hence, 40066-01-01-00Z). However, if ACS data are missing,
the ground software cannot directly
determine the start and end of a slew maneuver.
If you find obsIDs with a "C" or "D" designation --
Between 2000 Sept 6 16:00 - Sept 13 15:40 (UT), the RXTE satellite
suffered errors in attitude determination. Corrective action was taken
and the problem is believed solved. However, RXTE PIs and archival
users should note that data obtained during this interval may be
subject to attitude errors of up to 1 degree which will not be
reflected in the attitude file. Quantities such as the pointing
position, Earth limb angle, offset angle etc, are very likely to be
incorrect. Effects on data analysis may include an apparent reduction
in the flux measured by the PCA and HEXTE instruments of up to a
factor of 5, and poor spectral fitting results. Please be EXTREMELY
cautious about drawing scientific conclusions from the affected
observations.
PIs of affected observations have been informed directly. Note that
the data from public TOOs performed during this period have been
released to the community, despite the uncertainty in attitude.
A team working at the Flight Dynamics Facility will attempt to
reconstruct the attitude of the satellite during this interval. As
yet, we do not know how long this may take or how successful it will be.
Affected obsIDs have been tagged to indicate the unreliability of
the attitude data. The new data categories are:
No official policy or procedure is yet in place for automatically
scheduling re-observations of 'failed' observations, where the data
gaps render the scientific aims of the proposal unattainable. (In many
cases, it may be a complex judgment call whether the aims of the
observation can be achieved.)
In the meantime, if an examination of your GO data convinces you that
the RXTE observation has been a failure, please write to
xteplan@athena.gsfc.nasa.gov
providing information about the data gap and requesting a
rescheduling, or
xtehelp@athena.gsfc.nasa.gov
if you need help in assessing your data or have any general questions
about data gaps.
Introduction and Summary
The Transponder Failure
Categories of Data Gap
New Naming Scheme for ObsIDs Affected by Gaps
The Effects On Your Analysis
Addendum: Attitude Errors, 2000 Sept 6-13
'Failed' Observations, and Re-observations
If you have a question about RXTE, please send email to one of our
help desks.

