| Search in Xamin or Browse... | MDWARFASC - Bright M Dwarf All-Sky Catalog | HEASARC Archive | 
Parallax measurements, when available, and photometric distance estimates are provided for all stars, and these place most systems within 60 pc of the Sun. Spectral type estimated from V-J color shows that most of the stars range from K7 to M4, with only a few late M dwarfs, all within 20 pc. Proximity to the Sun also makes these stars good targets for high-resolution exoplanet imaging searches, especially if younger objects can be identified on the basis of X-ray or UV excess. For that purpose, we include X-ray flux from ROSAT and FUV/NUV ultraviolet magnitudes from GALEX for all stars for which a counterpart can be identified in those catalogs. Additional photometric data include optical magnitudes from Digitized Sky Survey plates and infrared magnitudes from the Two Micron All Sky Survey.
An All-Sky catalog of Bright M Dwarfs Lepine, S., Gaidos, E. <Astronomical J., 142, 138 (2011)> =2011AJ....142..138L (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
Name
  The name of the star. Each of the 8889 stars in this catalog is
  identified with the standard proper motion star ID used in the SUPERBLINK
  proper motion survey, modified by the HEASARC to conform with the naming
  conventions discussed in the Dictionary of Nomenclature of Celestial Objects.
  These SUPERBLINK names have prefixes of the form "PMI J" (in the original
  reference table the prefixes "PM I" were used) followed by five digits which
  relate to the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS) right ascension
  (RA) of the star in sexagesimal coordinates; the first four digits are the
  hours and minutes of RA,
  the fifth digit is the seconds of RA divided by 6 and rounded
  down to the nearest integer. These are followed by the declination sign and
  then four digits which replicate the ICRS Declination (hours, then minutes) of
  the source. A disambiguation letter (NSEW) is used when the scheme would leave
  two stars with the same name, with the letter indicating the relative
  orientation of the stars in the pair.
HIP_Name
  The source designation of the star in the Hipparcos Catalog.
  These aliases are provided for convenience because Hipparcos names are now
  commonly used to refer to very bright stars, and because many exoplanet
  surveys have adopted the Hipparcos names in designating the host stars and
  their exoplanets. The list includes a total of 977 Hipparcos stars.
TYC_Name
  The source designation of the star in the Tycho-2 Catalog.
  The Tycho-2 names are useful in identifying objects for which the proper
  motion is known to higher accuracy. The list includes a total of 1859
  Tycho-2 stars.
CNS3_Name
  The source designation of the stars in the Third Catalog of
  Nearby Stars, otherwise known as CNS3. These are convenient because CNS3 names
  have been widely adopted by the exoplanet community to designate nearby stars.
  The CNS3 counterparts are found after cross-correlation with the catalog of
  revised positions by Stauffer et al. (2010, PASP, 122, 885: available in
  HEASARC Browse as the GLIESE2MAS table) which lists 4106 objects. A total of
  1529 stars from the present catalog of bright M dwarfs are thus matched to
  their CNS3 counterparts. Stars with CNS3 counterparts include most of the very
  nearest systems. However, the CNS3 does suffer from a significant kinematic
  bias because it is largely based on the proper motion catalogs of Luyten,
  particularly the LHS catalog which has a relatively high proper motion limit
  mu >~ 450 mas yr-1. As a result, many stars in the present list which are
  identify herein as very nearby objects do not have CNS3 names; these are
  typically stars with relatively small (mu <~ 300 mas yr-1) proper motions.
RA
  The Right Ascension of the star in the selected equinox. This was
  given in decimal degree coordinates (2000.0 epoch) in the ICRS system and
  to a precision of 10-6 degrees in the original table. The 2000.0 epoch
  means that current positions must be extrapolated using the tabulated proper
  motions. For stars listed in the Hipparcos catalog, the authors have
  extrapolated the positions to the 2000.0 epoch from the values listed in
  van Leeuwen (2007, A&A, 474, 653: available in
  HEASARC Browse as the HIPNEWCAT table) which were listed for epoch 1991.25.
  For all other stars, the 2000.0 coordinates are based on the position of their
  2MASS counterparts as listed in Cutri et al. (2003, The 2MASS All-Sky Catalog
  of Point Sources) and extrapolated to the 2000.0 epoch from the epoch of the
  2MASS observations. The positions are typically accurate to 0.8 arcsecs, which
  are the quoted 2MASS catalog errors on the absolute astrometry; proper motion
  errors have little effect on the accuracy of the extrapolated positions
  because of the proximity of the 2MASS survey epoch to the millennium year
  (<3 years).
Dec
  The Declination of the star in the selected equinox. This was
  given in decimal degree coordinates (2000.0 epoch) in the ICRS system and
  to a precision of 10-6 degrees in the original table. The 2000.0 epoch
  means that current positions must be extrapolated using the tabulated proper
  motions. For stars listed in the Hipparcos catalog, the authors have
  extrapolated the positions to the 2000.0 epoch from the values listed in
  van Leeuwen (2007, A&A, 474, 653: available in
  HEASARC Browse as the HIPNEWCAT table) which were listed for epoch 1991.25.
  For all other stars, the 2000.0 coordinates are based on the position of their
  2MASS counterparts as listed in Cutri et al. (2003, The 2MASS All-Sky Catalog
  of Point Sources) and extrapolated to the 2000.0 epoch from the epoch of the
  2MASS observations. The positions are typically accurate to 0.8 arcsecs, which
  are the quoted 2MASS catalog errors on the absolute astrometry; proper motion
  errors have little effect on the accuracy of the extrapolated positions
  because of the proximity of the 2MASS survey epoch to the millennium year
  (<3 years).
LII
  The Galactic Longitude of the star.
BII
  The Galactic Latitude of the star.
PM_Tot
  The total annual proper motion of the star, in arcsecs/yr.
  These proper motions are from three separate sources. Stars with Hipparcos
  counterparts are listed with their proper motion from the Hipparcos catalog
  (van Leeuwen 2007). Stars not in the Hipparcos catalog but with counterparts
  in the Tycho-2 catalog are listed with their proper motion from Tycho-2 (Hog
  et al. 2000, A&A, 355, L27). The Hipparcos and Tycho-2 proper motions are
  typically accurate to 0.5-2.0 mas yr-1. For stars not listed in either
  Hipparcos or Tycho-2, the proper motions listed are those measured in the
  SUPERBLINK proper motion survey. These proper motions are based on a
  re-analysis of the DSS images, as described in detail in Lepine & Shara (2005,
  AJ, 129, 1483); these proper motions have a typical precision of +/- 8 mas
  yr-1. One can determine the source of the proper motion by checking whether
  the star has a Hipparcos or Tycho-2 name.
PM_RA
  The vector component of the annual proper motion of the star in the
  Right Ascension direction, in arcsecs/yr.
PM_Dec
  The vector component of the annual proper motion of the star in the
  Declination direction, in arcsecs/yr.
Parallax
  The astrometric (trigonometric) parallax of the star, in
  arcseconds. Astrometric parallaxes are recovered from the literature for 1422
  of the M dwarfs in this catalog.
Parallax_Error
  The measurement error in the quoted trigonometric parallax,
  in arcseconds.
Ref_Parallax
  The reference source for the trigonometric parallax coded
  as follows (see Section 2.4.1 of the reference paper for a discussion of
  the list of papers and catalogs that were searched to recover the parallaxes):
  
      Co05: Costa et al. 2005, AJ, 130, 337;
      Ga08: Gatewood 2008, AJ, 136, 452;
      Ga09: Gatewood & Coban 2009, AJ, 137, 402;
      Ha93: Harrington et al. 1993, AJ, 105, 1571;
      He06: Henry et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 2360;
      Ja05: Jao et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 1954;
      Ja11: Jao et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 117;
      Kh10: Khrutskaya et al. 2010, Astron. Lett, 35, 576;
      Le09: Lepine et al. 2009, AJ, 137, 4109;
      Mo92: Monet et al. 1992, AJ, 103, 638;
      My02: Myers et al. 2002, SKY2000 Master Catalog, Version 4;
      Ri10: Riedel et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 897;
      Sm07: Smart et al. 2007, A&A, 464, 787;
      VA95: van Altena et al. 1995, General Catalog of Trigonometric
              Stellaar Parallaxes;
      VL07: van Leeuwen 2007, A&A, 474, 653;
      NSTA: NStars database (http://nstars.nau.edu/nau_nstars/index.htm).
RASS_Count_Rate
  The ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS) count rate of the
  associated X-ray source, in ct/s. The authors cross-correlated this list of
  bright M dwarfs with both the ROSAT All-Sky Bright Source Catalog (Voges et
  al. 1999, A&A, 349, 389: available in
  HEASARC Browse as the RASSBSC table) and the ROSAT All-Sky Survey Faint Source
  Catalog (Voges et al. 2000, IAU Circ. 7432, 1: available in
  HEASARC Browse as the RASSFSC table). They used a search radius of 15 arcsecs,
  which is on the order of the astrometric precision of the ROSAT catalog. This
  search identified 1065 stars with X-ray counterparts.
GALEX_Fmag
  The GALEX far-UV (1350-1750 Angstroms) magnitude of the star.
  The catalog was cross-correlated against the fifth data release (DR5) of the
  GALEX mission. Using a 5 arcsecs search radius, the authors found GALEX
  counterparts for 3905 of the 8889 stars on their list. Some 762 objects have
  counterparts in both the FUV and NUV, while 3115 have counterparts only in the
  NUV, leaving 28 stars with a counterpart in the FUV only.
GALEX_Nmag
  The GALEX near-UV (1750-2800 Angstroms) magnitude of the star.
  The catalog was cross-correlated against the fifth data release (DR5) of the
  GALEX mission. Using a 5 arcsecs search radius, the authors found GALEX
  counterparts for 3905 of the 8889 stars on their list. Some 762 objects have
  counterparts in both the FUV and NUV, while 3115 have counterparts only in the
  NUV, leaving 28 stars with a counterpart in the FUV only.
BT_Mag
  The Tycho-2 BT magnitude of the star. The authors
  included optical magnitudes BT and VT as they are listed in the Hipparcos
  and Tycho-2 catalogs, when these were available. The BT and VT magnitudes
  are useful because they are generally more accurate (0.1 mag or better) than
  the photographic magnitudes which are listed for all the stars
VT_Mag
  The Tycho-2 VT magnitude of the star. The authors
  included optical magnitudes BT and VT as they are listed in the Hipparcos
  and Tycho-2 catalogs, when these were available. The BT and VT magnitudes
  are useful because they are generally more accurate (0.1 mag or better) than
  the photographic magnitudes which are listed for all the stars
BJ_Mag
  The USNO-B1.0 photographic blue (IIIaJ) magnitude b of the star.
  Optical magnitudes are obtained from the USNO-B1.0 catalog of Monet et al.
  (2003, AJ, 125, 984), which is based on scans of historical photographic
  surveys. The blue magnitudes are extracted mostly from scans of IIIaJ plates
  from the Palomar Sky Surveys (POSS-I, POSS-II) and the Southern ESO Schmidt
  (SERC) Survey. Red magnitudes are extracted from scans of IIIaF plates from
  POSS-I and POSS-II and also from the Anglo-Australian Observatory red survey
  (AAO-red). Photographic infrared magnitudes are extracted from IVn plates from
  POSS-II and SERC. Cross-correlation with the USNO-B1.0 catalog is performed as
  part of the SUPERBLINK quality control procedure, and all ambiguous cases are
  verified by visual examination using overlays of the USNO-B1.0 sources on the
  DSS scans. Since the optical b, r, i, magnitudes are based on scans of
  photographic plates, they are generally not as reliable as magnitudes measured
  on electronic detectors, such as those from 2MASS and GALEX. Photographic
  magnitudes are typically accurate to only +/- 0.5 mag.
RF_Mag
  The USNO-B1.0 photographic red (IIIaF) magnitude r of the star.
  Optical magnitudes are obtained from the USNO-B1.0 catalog of Monet et al.
  (2003, AJ, 125, 984), which is based on scans of historical photographic
  surveys. The blue magnitudes are extracted mostly from scans of IIIaJ plates
  from the Palomar Sky Surveys (POSS-I, POSS-II) and the Southern ESO Schmidt
  (SERC) Survey. Red magnitudes are extracted from scans of IIIaF plates from
  POSS-I and POSS-II and also from the Anglo-Australian Observatory red survey
  (AAO-red). Photographic infrared magnitudes are extracted from IVn plates from
  POSS-II and SERC. Cross-correlation with the USNO-B1.0 catalog is performed as
  part of the SUPERBLINK quality control procedure, and all ambiguous cases are
  verified by visual examination using overlays of the USNO-B1.0 sources on the
  DSS scans. Since the optical b, r, i, magnitudes are based on scans of
  photographic plates, they are generally not as reliable as magnitudes measured
  on electronic detectors, such as those from 2MASS and GALEX. Photographic
  magnitudes are typically accurate to only +/- 0.5 mag.
In_Mag
  The USNO-B1.0 photographic infrared (IVn) magnitude i of the star.
  Optical magnitudes are obtained from the USNO-B1.0 catalog of Monet et al.
  (2003, AJ, 125, 984), which is based on scans of historical photographic
  surveys. The blue magnitudes are extracted mostly from scans of IIIaJ plates
  from the Palomar Sky Surveys (POSS-I, POSS-II) and the Southern ESO Schmidt
  (SERC) Survey. Red magnitudes are extracted from scans of IIIaF plates from
  POSS-I and POSS-II and also from the Anglo-Australian Observatory red survey
  (AAO-red). Photographic infrared magnitudes are extracted from IVn plates from
  POSS-II and SERC. Cross-correlation with the USNO-B1.0 catalog is performed as
  part of the SUPERBLINK quality control procedure, and all ambiguous cases are
  verified by visual examination using overlays of the USNO-B1.0 sources on the
  DSS scans. Since the optical b, r, i, magnitudes are based on scans of
  photographic plates, they are generally not as reliable as magnitudes measured
  on electronic detectors, such as those from 2MASS and GALEX. Photographic
  magnitudes are typically accurate to only +/- 0.5 mag.
Jmag
  The 2MASS infrared J magnitude of the star.
  As part of the quality control process, all the stars in the SUPERBLINK proper
  motion survey have their counterparts identified in the 2MASS catalog of Cutri
  et al. (2003, The 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources). As described in
  Section 3.2.1 of the reference paper, the 2MASS counterparts provide the
  absolute astrometry for SUPERBLINK objects. Because of the color restriction
  V-J > 2.7 given in equation (1) of the reference, every object in the catalog
  is required to have a counterpart in 2MASS. The magnitudes are generally
  accurate to +/- 0.08 mag, though one should refer to the 2MASS documentation
  for a detailed discussion of magnitude errors and uncertainties. Very bright
  stars (J < 5), in particular, are saturated in 2MASS and have larger
  photometric uncertainties.
Hmag
  The 2MASS infrared H magnitude of the star.
  As part of the quality control process, all the stars in the SUPERBLINK proper
  motion survey have their counterparts identified in the 2MASS catalog of Cutri
  et al. (2003, The 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources). As described in
  Section 3.2.1 of the reference paper, the 2MASS counterparts provide the
  absolute astrometry for SUPERBLINK objects. Because of the color restriction
  V-J > 2.7 given in equation (1) of the reference, every object in the catalog
  is required to have a counterpart in 2MASS. The magnitudes are generally
  accurate to +/- 0.08 mag, though one should refer to the 2MASS documentation
  for a detailed discussion of magnitude errors and uncertainties. Very bright
  stars (J < 5), in particular, are saturated in 2MASS and have larger
  photometric uncertainties.
Ks_Mag
  The 2MASS infrared Ks magnitude of the star.
  As part of the quality control process, all the stars in the SUPERBLINK proper
  motion survey have their counterparts identified in the 2MASS catalog of Cutri
  et al. (2003, The 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources). As described in
  Section 3.2.1 of the reference paper, the 2MASS counterparts provide the
  absolute astrometry for SUPERBLINK objects. Because of the color restriction
  V-J > 2.7 given in equation (1) of the reference, every object in the catalog
  is required to have a counterpart in 2MASS. The magnitudes are generally
  accurate to +/- 0.08 mag, though one should refer to the 2MASS documentation
  for a detailed discussion of magnitude errors and uncertainties. Very bright
  stars (J < 5), in particular, are saturated in 2MASS and have larger
  photometric uncertainties.
Vmag_Eff
  The estimated visual magnitude of the star.
  For bright stars, this is the visual magnitude VT quoted in the Hipparcos or
  Tycho-2 catalogs. For faint stars, it is a combination of the photographic b,
  r, and i magnitudes, following the algorithm described in Lepine & Shara (2005,
  AJ, 129, 1483) where this effective visual magnitude is labeled as Ve. In
  this present study, the authors use the shorter form V for convenience, but it
  should be understood that all the mentions of V actually refer to this
  effective visual magnitude Ve.
VJ_Color
  The optical-to-infrared V-J color of the star
Phot_Parallax
  The photometric parallax of the star, in arcseconds.
  Photometric distances are estimated for all the stars based on the
  (V-J)-MV color-magnitude relationship for M dwarfs calibrated in Lepine
  (2005, AJ, 130, 1247) and detailed in equation (14) of the reference paper.
  Photometric parallaxes piphot are then calculated based on the estimated
  absolute magnitude MV and the apparent visual magnitude V.
  As discussed in Lepine (2005), the relationship has a scatter of 0.7 mag about
  the mean, which typically results in photometric distances with errors of
  +/- 50%. In Figure 9 of the reference paper, teh authors compare the
  photometric distances to triangulated distances, for stars with available
  parallaxes. Of the 1422 M dwarfs with parallaxes, some 1206 stars have
  photometric distance estimates within +/- 50% of the astrometric distance, but
  only 772 have photometric distances that are accurate to +/- 20%. There is
  also a significant number of outliers which could be unrecognized giants,
  young field stars, or unresolved doubles, all of which would have distances
  underestimated by photometry. Metal-poor stars (M subdwarfs) on the other hand
  would have their distances overestimated by photometry. Spectroscopic
  follow-up would be required to identify all such objects.
  Thus, while photometric distances are conveniently provided here for all the
  stars, one should bear in mind that these are mainly for guidance purposes,
  as these distances carry large uncertainties in many cases. Astrometric
  parallaxes should be preferred for stars for which they are available, and
  should be measured for the remaining objects in this catalog.
Phot_Parallax_Error
  The uncertainty in the photometric parallax of the
  star, in arcseconds.
Phot_Spect_Type
  The photometric spectral subtype ST of the star.
  For all the stars, the authors provide an estimated spectral subtype which is
  based on the relationship between V-J color and the spectral subtype (see
  Figure 3 of the reference paper). They use a simple two-component linear
  relationship to estimate the subtype ST which is given in equation (15) of
  the reference paper. The authors use lowercase letters (k,m) instead of the
  usual uppercase (K, M) to indicate that the spectral type is only an estimate;
  a value of ST = = -1 yields an estimated subtype of k7. A histogram of the
  estimated subtype distribution is shown in Figure 10 of the reference paper,
  where it becomes clear that this magnitude-limited catalog of bright M dwarfs
  is biased toward stars of earlier subtypes, and breaks down beyond spectral
  subtype M4. These subtypes may be used as a guide in selecting targets of
  interest. Some of the stars on the list, in particular stars listed in the
  CNS3, already have published literature about them, and the interested user
  would be advised to verify the existence of formal spectral classification(s).
  The authors are currently conducting a spectroscopic follow-up survey to
  obtain formal spectral types for the brightest stars in this catalog, and
  intend to provide formal spectral classifications for them in the near future.
Class
  The HEASARC Browse object classification, based on the value of the
  phot_spect_type parameter (q.v. for the caveats on the accuracy of this
  spectral classification).