nasalogo Office of Space Science
NASA Research Announcements
Table of ContentsNRA HomeOSS HomeNASA Home

NRA 99-OSS-02
Appendix D

GUIDELINES FOR COMPTON GAMMA RAY OBSERVATORY
GUEST INVESTIGATOR PROPOSALS DURING CYCLE 9

The information contained in Appendix D augments and supersedes Appendix B and is applicable only to this NRA.

Cycle 9 of the Compton GRO Mission is planned to begin in December 1999 and will last approximately 18 months. Data products from previous CGRO observation cycles will also be available for analysis during Cycle 9. See the Compton GRO home page at http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/cgro for details. Proposals utilizing existing data and correlative studies closely related to the Compton GRO mission will also be given consideration.

General information relating to the Compton GRO Guest Investigator Program, data products, types of proposals, mission phases, and modes of participation can be found in Appendix C. Proposal Types 1-4 are solicited during Cycle 9. Appendix G, provides detailed information about the instruments, their scientific objectives, sensitivities, and data products.

I. Opportunities For Guest Investigations

  1. Analysis or Use of Archival Data (Proposal Type 1)

    Data products from previous cycles will be available for use during Cycle 9. The specific products and their availability are described in detail in Appendices G and H.

    Previous observations are summarized in the viewing plans or "timelines" for each previous cycle. Previous viewing plans, abstracts of previously approved programs, as well as additional information on sky exposure for EGRET and COMPTEL, are available on the Internet through the Compton GRO home page at http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/cgro.

    Observing timelines are most significantly constrained by spacecraft thermal and power considerations (location of the Sun) and by the requirement that likely discrete sources of gamma radiation be observable by the OSSE experiment. The OSSE detectors can rotate over a full range of 192o about the Y-axis, providing the capability to observe sources in the X-Z plane. For each Z-axis pointing of the spacecraft, an X-axis orientation is chosen to provide, ideally, two targets for OSSE to observe (refer to Figure 1 for definition of axes). The BATSE instruments provide continuous sensitivity to the entire unocculted sky and do not affect the viewing program.

    labeled figure of cgro

  2. Observing Time Proposals (Proposal Type 2)

    Observing time will be allocated with no predetermined ratio between Guest Investigators and Instrument Team members. There are no targets reserved for the Instrument Teams, other than those uniquely related to the objectives described in section III.A.1 of Appendix C.

    1. EGRET, COMPTEL, AND OSSE

      Excepting the specific topics for which these Instrument Teams have sole responsibility, as listed above in Appendix C, section III.A.1, Guest Investigators may propose observations without restrictions. Target conflicts will be taken into consideration in the selection process.

    2. BATSE

      In addition to the gamma-ray burst and solar flare data discussed earlier, investigators may propose to analyze the data continuously obtained by the BATSE instrument. This includes temporal observations of hard x-ray sources performed using the Earth occultation technique, as well as observations of pulsating sources.

      Excepting the any assigned solely to the BATSE Instrument Team, as described in Appendix C, Guest Investigators may propose BATSE observations without restrictions. Investigators wishing to work on the determination of burst positions by arrival time difference methods may contact the BATSE Team for a possible collaboration.

      The specific observing modes and data products are detailed in Appendix G.

  3. Targets of Opportunity (ToO) (Proposal Type 2)

    One of the important objectives of Compton GRO is the observation of transient phenomena such as supernovae, novae, solar flares, or AGN variability. In order to make such observations, it may be necessary to interrupt the viewing program and reorient the satellite. Because such reorientations place significant demands on project resources, at most four or five such observations will be allowed during Cycle 9. Investigators may propose to observe Targets of Opportunity (ToOs), either for individual objects or for classes of objects. If a candidate ToO occurs, the Project Scientist will determine whether or not a formal ToO declaration is made. Proposers should be as specific as possible in defining the trigger criteria for ToO activation. The peer review committees will be asked to carefully review these criteria and recommend changes as deemed warranted.

    Data resulting from any peer-review approved ToO program will be the exclusive property of the proposer for the normal 3-month proprietary period. If an unproposed ToO candidate appears, and a decision is made to observe it, the data will be made available immediately after processing through the public archive at the Compton GRO Science Support Center.

    ToO programs will generally not be funded until a ToO satisfying the proposer's trigger criteria occurs and a formal ToO declaration is made by the Project Scientist.

  4. Other Guest Investigator Opportunities (Proposal Types 3 and 4)

    Correlative research (Type 3) proposals are welcome during Cycle 9, although they will generally be given a lower funding priority than observing (Type 2) or data analysis (Type 1) proposals. An exception to this policy will be made in the case of correlative observation programs utilizing the BACODINE system, or related methods, to search for counterparts to gamma-ray bursts discovered by Compton GRO at nongamma-ray wavelengths.

    Service proposals (Type 4) are solicited during Cycle 9, although they will be given a lower funding profile than observing (Type 2) or data analysis (Type 1) proposals. Note the restrictions in Section III.B of Appendix C on what types of activities are eligible for support within service proposals under the Compton GRO Guest Investigator Program.

  5. Additional Information

    1. Proposals requesting access to more than one Compton GRO instrument, either for observing time or for analysis of existing data, may be submitted under one cover.

    2. Multiyear proposals, which under certain conditions had been accommodated during previous cycles, will not be considered for Cycle 9 and beyond.

      General information concerning Compton GRO Guest Investigator opportunities during Cycle 9 can be obtained from: Dr. Chris R. Shrader, Compton GRO Science Support Center, Code 661, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. 20771-0001. (E-mail: shrader@grossc.gsfc.nasa.gov or Telephone: (301) 286-8434). Also see http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/cgro on the Internet.

II. Proposal Preparation and Submission Information

This NASA Research Announcement soliciting participation in Cycle 9 of the Compton GRO Guest Investigator Program is fully open to the international scientific community. The following guidelines should be followed in the preparation of proposals for participation in this program.

  1. Requests for Appendices

    Proposers interested in receiving Appendix G (The Compton GRO as a Guest Investigator Facility) and Appendix H (Compton GRO Project Data Management Plan, July 1990) should submit a request as soon as convenient. There are also a limited number of copies of Appendix F (The Compton Gamma Ray Observatory Science Plan, September 1989, prepared by the Compton GRO Science Working Team). Requests should be made to the following address:

    Ms. Sandy Barnes
    Compton GRO Cycle 9 NRA
    Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory Science Support Center
    Code 661
    Goddard Space Flight Center
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Greenbelt, MD 20771-0001
    USA
    E-mail: barnes@grossc.gsfc.nasa.gov

    Alternatively, Appendices G and H can be accessed electronically on the Compton GRO Science Support Center homepage at http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/cgro or on the NASA Office of Space Science homepage at http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/oss/ by selecting "Research Opportunities."

  2. Proposal Format, Content, Quantity, and Certification

    1. Overview

      The proposal review procedure will be conducted in two stages to minimize the burden of proposal preparation. During the first part, the scientific and technical merits of the proposed investigation will be reviewed, including the appropriateness of using Compton GRO to address the scientific objectives and its relevance to furthering the understanding of high energy astrophysical processes. Based upon the criteria defined in Appendix D section III of this NRA, a panel of scientific peers will evaluate all submitted proposals as the Stage 1 review (Scientific and Technical Review). Additional details, including an approximate funding-level guideline, will be provided with the Stage 2 solicitation. A subset of the scientific peer review committee and project officials will review these Stage 2 proposals. The HQ Program Scientist will then make specific funding recommendations to the Selecting Official for these proposals. As was the case in all previous cycles, investigators working outside the U.S. are not eligible for NASA funding support.

    2. Stage 1 Proposal Content

      The Stage 1 Proposal must include a set of standard cover forms as described below. The information in the forms will be entered into a data base that will be used in cataloging and evaluating proposals. Note that for approved proposals, NASA plans to enter information from the cover page into an electronically accessible database to be made available to proposers to this and other related Space Science Programs. Proposal titles, names of Principal Investigators and their institutions, and abstracts of all selected proposals will be published in an publicly accessible database. Therefore, the submitted abstract should not contain any proprietary information that would preclude its release without restriction.

      a) Proposal Forms: Electronic, as well as hard copy, submission of each of the forms described below is required. The form submission software will automatically provide a printable (LaTeX) hard copy. For instructions, send a blank E-mail message to rps@legacy.gsfc.nasa.gov.

      Each proposal must have a standard cover page, a proposal Cover Form, and a General Information Form. For proposals requesting observing time, an Observation Definition Form(s), and optionally, Observation Constraints and Special Requirements Forms, specifying each target or target grouping, must be included. Paper copies of these forms are enclosed in Appendix E.

      The Cover Form should include an Abstract summarizing the proposed research in a concise manner. The abstract should be limited to 1000 characters, including spaces between words. If the abstract exceeds this length, it will be truncated automatically.

      NASA requests that each proposer who anticipates requesting funding provide an approximate estimate of the total cost to NASA of his/her proposed investigation. This information will be used in gauging the approximate total cost to NASA of the ensemble of proposals. A more detailed cost evaluation will be deferred until the Stage 2 review. The requested amount in the final cost proposal included in the Stage 2 submission should not exceed this estimate. Please use the box provided on the General Information Form to enter this figure. As with other proposal form information, electronic and hard copy submission are both required.

      Note that although a signature block is included on the general form, institutional endorsements are optional with the initial proposal submission. The cost estimate is considered to be a guideline to the project, rather than a final budget request, as such, institutional endorsement is not required at this stage. Institutional endorsements will be required later with Stage 2 submissions. A signature block is provided in case signatures are required by the proposer's institution at the initial submission stage.

      b).Technical Section: The scientific and technical section of the proposal (including text, tables, references, and figures, but not including the mandatory forms) is limited to four pages (i.e., two double-sided sheets). The text should be contained in the first three pages, with the fourth page reserved for figures and/or tables. There are no exceptions to this policy. In all cases, type should not be smaller than 10 point, there should be no more than 55, single spaced lines per 8_"_11" page, and margins should be a minimum of 1" on all sides.

      Proposers are requested to summarize within these pages the scientific justification, the feasibility of the observations, and plans for data analysis. Two-sided copy should be used for the main body of the proposal.

      c).Summary of Previous Compton GRO work: Curriculum Vitae should not be included, nor should any appendices or other attachments such as reprints of journal articles.

      The PI for each proposed Cycle 9 Investigation should include a list of previous approved Compton GRO Guest Investigations for which he/she was the PI. This should simply state the proposal title and the mission phase/cycle.

      In addition to this list of previous investigations, the PI of the proposed investigation should compile a chronologically sorted list of publications resulting from these previous programs for which he/she is primary- or co-author. This should include the paper titles, but otherwise be in standard journal format. Truncate or edit as necessary to comply with the overall 2- page limit for this section.

      The entire listing of previous programs, publication list should not exceed 2 pages (one double-sided sheet). Truncate publication lists (e.g. retaining the most recent references), as necessary.

    3. Stage 2 Proposal

      A cost proposal will be requested for all successful proposed investigations that pass the Stage 1 review and that require financial support from NASA. As part of the proposal and corresponding budget for a Compton GRO investigation, proposers may request support for correlative observations at other wavelengths. Funding for such correlative studies will be considered only insofar as they directly support a specific investigation using Compton GRO. Furthermore, funding priorities will favor Compton GRO observations and data analysis proposals as detailed in Appendix C. The cost proposal may be prepared according to the guidelines of the institution submitting the proposal, but it must contain:

      • A complete list of all awarded or pending research funding support from NASA or other sources for the Principal Investigator and Co-investigators. The information needed includes: Agency, Grant/Contract Number, Title, Amount, Starting and Ending Dates, and Level of Effort (percent).
      • A detailed breakdown of the responsibilities of the various investigators taking part in the proposed study.
      • Cost estimates for direct labor, including individual person-months and rates for the personnel involved.
      • Estimated costs for equipment, materials, and computer services, including type of computer and number of hours of mainframe computer use. Itemize items over $500.
      • Travel costs - itemize trips, including travel to data analysis centers. In general, only one trip per team member to a professional society meeting will be supported.
      • Overhead rates and cost.
      • Other costs, with explanation, including any E/PO proposal costs.
      • Contributions from any cost-sharing plan.
      • Total cost of support being requested from NASA.

      Funding under this Program is available only to Principal Investigators and Co-Investigators affiliated with U.S. institutions.

  3. Submission of Proposals:

    Fifteen copies, including the original, of all proposals should be sent to:

    Compton GRO Guest Investigator Program
    NRA 99-OSS-02
    Code 661
    Building 2, Room 246
    Goddard Space Flight Center
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Greenbelt, MD 20771-0001
    USA
    Telephone: (301) 286-8434
    E-mail: shrader@grossc.gsfc.nasa.gov

    Electronic submission of all proposal forms (including the cover page, general form, and observation definition form) is a requirement for Cycle 9. For details, send a blank E-mail message to:

    rps@legacy.gsfc.nasa.gov
    Additional information can be obtained from the World Wide Web at:

    http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/cgro
    Proposals should be mailed so as to arrive at the above address before the proposal due date. NASA reserves the right to consider proposals received after this date if judged to be in the best interest of the Government.

  4. Guidelines for Foreign Participation:

    NASA welcomes proposals from outside the U.S. However, investigators working outside the U.S. are not eligible for funding from NASA. Proposals from non-U.S. entities should not include a cost plan. Proposals from outside the U.S. and U.S. proposals that include non-U.S. participation must be endorsed by the respective government agency or funding/sponsoring institution in that country from which the non-U.S. participant is proposing. Such endorsement should indicate that the proposal merits careful consideration by NASA, and if the proposal is selected, sufficient funds will be made available to undertake the activity as proposed.

    In addition to sending the requested number of copies of the proposal to the designated address, one copy of the proposal, along with the Letter of Endorsement from the sponsoring non-U.S. agency must be forwarded to:

    Ms. W. C. Barnes
    (NRA 99-OSS-02)
    Space Science and Aeronautics Division
    Code IS
    NASA Headquarters
    Washington, DC 20546-0001
    USA

    All proposals must be typewritten in English. All non-U.S. proposals will undergo the same evaluation and selection process as those originating in the U.S. All proposals must be received before the established closing date; those received after the closing date will be treated in accordance with NASA's provisions for late proposals. Sponsoring non-U.S. agencies may, in exceptional situations, forward a proposal without endorsement to the above address if endorsement is not possible before the announced closing date. In such cases, however, NASA's Space Science and Aeronautics Division should be advised when a decision on endorsement can be expected.

    Successful and unsuccessful proposers will be contacted directly by the NASA Research Program Management Division. Copies of these letters will be sent to the sponsoring government agency. Should a non-U.S. proposal or a U.S. proposal with non-U.S. participation be selected, NASA's Space Science and Aeronautics Division will arrange with the non-U.S. sponsoring agency for the proposed participation on a no-exchange-of-funds basis, in which NASA and the non-U.S. sponsoring agency will each bear the cost of discharging their respective responsibilities. Depending on the nature and extent of the proposed cooperation, these arrangements may entail:

    1. A letter of notification by NASA, and
    2. An exchange of letters between NASA and the sponsoring governmental agency; or
    3. A formal Agency-to-Agency Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).

  5. German Guest Investigator Program:

    The German Space Agency (DARA Ltd.) supports a German Guest Investigator Program. The program guarantees that Compton GRO Guest Investigators get sufficient support and help at the Max-Planck-Institut f¸r Extraterrestrische Physik for Compton GRO (COMPTEL and EGRET) data analysis. In addition, the program will provide limited travel and accommodation funds to those German scientists who want to visit or work closely with the Max-Planck-Institut (or with any of the Compton GRO research institutes in the US or the Netherlands). The German Guest Investigator Program is open to scientists from all countries. Proposers to the German program must also respond to this NASA Research Announcement. The proposals will be reviewed by the Peer Review Panel along with all other proposals.

    Proposers to this NRA who wish to be considered for support under the German program must also submit an abbreviated proposal, as described below, to the German program at the address given below. The full proposal (conforming to the requirements specified in this NRA) will be evaluated together with all other proposals received in response to this NRA by a NASA-convened peer-review panel and NASA selecting official.

    Dr. Werner Klinkmann
    DARA GN-WE2
    Koenigswinterer Strasse 522-524
    P.O. Box 30 03 64
    5300 Bonn 3
    Germany

    The cost section should also indicate how the proposer wants to finance expenses:
    Proposers from non-German institutes who are interested in working at the Max-Planck-Institut must obtain financial support from their respective countries (they need not submit proposals to the DARA or the Max Planck Institute). However, fellowships from the Max-Planck-Society will be available for a limited number of proposers (three to five per year). Those interested in working at the Max Planck Institute under this fellowship program should contact:

    Dr. V. Sch–nfelder
    Max-Planck-Institut f¸r Extraterrestrische Physik
    Forschungsgel”nde
    8046 Garching bei M¸nchen
    Germany

III. Proposal Evaluation, Selection and Implementation

  1. Stage 1 Proposal

    Proposals for investigations under the Compton GRO Guest Investigator program will be evaluated by a NASA-convened peer review panel made up from the international scientific community. The panel will include representation from European countries with substantial involvement in the Compton GRO mission.

    The following criteria replace the criteria given in Appendix B. The criteria given in this paragraph apply only to the evaluation of proposals submitted in response to this NRA. The criteria in descending order of importance are:

    For those proposals requesting Compton GRO observing time, the peer review panel will assign one of three observational priorities to each proposed pointing for the COMPTEL, EGRET, or OSSE instruments. Priority A will be assigned to excellent, highest priority observations involving the best science and best usage of Compton GRO. Priority B will be assigned to important observations that should be accommodated if at all possible. Priority C will be assigned to observations which have a less compelling rationale and will be accommodated in the mission timeline as circumstances permit. Proposals, with target prioritizations, will be submitted to the Compton GRO Timeline Committee in order to formulate the overall observing timeline for Cycle 9.

  2. Stage 2 Proposal Evaluation and Selection

    A peer-review panel comprised of a subset of the Stage 1 review panel and Compton GRO project officials will consider Stage 2 requests. Evaluation based on overall cost and scientific value will lead to the recommendation of a set of proposals by the Program Scientist for this NRA to the Selecting Official for final selection and award. In addition to the overall scientific/technical rating of the proposed investigation from the Stage 1 Review, the primary evaluation criterion in the Stage 2 evaluation will review the cost details of the investigation, including the degree to which it is deemed reasonable in the context of the anticipated level of effort required to carry out the investigation, balanced by the level of available funds.

    A recommendation for selection will be formulated by the Program Scientist for this NRA and then submitted to the selecting official, the Director, Research Program Management Division, Office of Space Science, following completion of the observing timeline. Selection will be based on the results of the Stage 1 evaluation, the results of the Stage 2 evaluation, and the results of the evaluation of any E/PO proposal. Proposals for observing time will be funded only after their accommodation in the Compton GRO timeline.

    The Government's obligation to make awards is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds from which payments can be made and the receipt of proposals that the Government determines are acceptable for award under this NRA. At the time of this writing, a total of approximately $0.5M is planned for the support of Guest Investigators working at U.S. Institutions during Cycle 9. Funds are also available for the analysis of existing data and for correlative studies relating to Compton GRO objectives.

    Grants in conformance with NASA Grant and Cooperative Agreement Handbook (NPG 5800.1D) dated July 23, 1996, or contracts in conformance with acquisitions regulations will be generated in order to fund successful proposals.

  3. Schedule:

    The schedule for Cycle 9 of the Compton GRO Guest Investigator Program follows. Note that the dates of events planned beyond the Stage 1 Proposals due date are estimates and subject to change.

    February 1, 1999Release of NRA
    May 6, 1999Stage 1 Proposals due
    July 1999Stage 1 Peer Review; Tentative Selection of Proposals
    July 1999Timeline Committee Meeting
    August 1999Stage 2 Proposals Due
    September 1999Final Selection of Proposals
    December 8, 1999Begin Cycle 9 observations


    Table of ContentsNRA HomeOSS HomeNASA Home

    Curator: Tanya Hamlet
    NASA Rep: Dr. Chris Shrader
    Last updated: February 1, 1999