RE: 3C454.3 seen by AGILE

["Toby Burnett" <tburnett@u.washington.edu>]

Wow, has there been any other information about their performance?
I'm a little puzzled by the number for the flux: "(3+/-1)*10E-6". Is
this a typo? Do they mean 3E-6 with 33% error? This makes sense. Or
3E-5? Here is how that is interpreted by python at least:
3*10e-6
3.0000000000000004e-005

--Toby

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Thompson [mailto:David.J.Thompson@nasa.gov] 
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 9:09 AM
To: AGNlist@glast.stanford.edu; Gamma-Ray Multiwavelength
Subject: 3C454.3 seen by AGILE

Colleagues,

In case you do not follow the Astronomer's Telegrams, the AGILE group 
has announced a preliminary detection of 3C454.3.

See http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=1160

All the more reason to keep up any observations of this source.

We all congratulate the AGILE team, I am sure!

Dave Thompson