Wow, has there been any other information about their performance?
I'm a little puzzled by the number for the flux: "(3+/-1)*10E-6". Is
this a typo? Do they mean 3E-6 with 33% error? This makes sense. Or
3E-5? Here is how that is interpreted by python at least:
3*10e-6
3.0000000000000004e-005
--Toby
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Thompson [mailto:David.J.Thompson@nasa.gov]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 9:09 AM
To: AGNlist@glast.stanford.edu; Gamma-Ray Multiwavelength
Subject: 3C454.3 seen by AGILE
Colleagues,
In case you do not follow the Astronomer's Telegrams, the AGILE group
has announced a preliminary detection of 3C454.3.
See http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=1160
All the more reason to keep up any observations of this source.
We all congratulate the AGILE team, I am sure!
Dave Thompson