Last Update: March 26th, 2018
What are the (apparently) brightest X-ray sources in the sky as seen from the Earth?
In the soft X-ray band (0.2 - 5 keV) the Sun is by far the brightest persistent X-ray source (by a factor of about a million) due to its proximity to the Earth. The flaring Sun is also arguably the brightest 'transient' or variable X-ray source, but a giant gamma-ray flare of the magnetar SGR 1806-20 on 27 Dec 2004 had a peak flux (in a hard band from 45 keV to 10 MeV) which rivalled a very large solar flare in its observed flux at the Earth (and covered a much broader energy range, to boot). A few other giant flares have been observed from the handful of other known magnetars.
Next after these sources, come the class of so-called soft X-ray transients (SXTs), sometimes also called X-ray novae, which are actually outbursts of X-ray binary systems containing accreting neutron stars or black holes; SXTs can stay bright for durations of days to months, and in some cases the ratio of maximum to minimum X-ray emission can be huge (many orders of magnitude).
Only one source (excluding the Sun) in the `top ten' brightest sources is a persistently bright X-ray source, namely the low-mass X-ray binary system Scorpius X-1. For completeness, after these 'top ten' sources, the brightest members of some of the other various classes of X-ray sources are listed, first for Galactic objects, then for extragalactic classes of objects.
A name in bold-face indicates that it is a steady or slowly varying X-ray source. A name in italics indicates that it is an X-ray transient source, e.g., an X-ray nova or a gamma-ray burst). An `@" indicates that this is the level seen during a flare (e.g., Algol and HR 1099) or an outburst (e.g., SS Cyg).
The energy range quoted for the X-ray fluxes and luminosities of the non-solar sources is 2-10 keV. The fluxes are given both in terms of cgs units and in multiples of the Crab flux, where 1 Crab = 2.4 x 10-8 erg/s/cm2.
|
Object |
Distance (parsecs) |
X-ray flux (erg/s/cm2) and in Crabs |
X-ray Luminosity (erg/s) |
Other Name or Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Very Large Solar Flare |
5 x 10-6 |
7 |
2 x 1028 |
Peres et al. (2000, ApJ, 528, 537) |
|
Largest Giant Gamma-ray Flare from SGR 1806-20 |
15,000 |
5 |
1 x 1047 (if energy were emitted isotropically) |
Magnetar (Palmer et al. 2005, Nature, 434, 1107) |
|
Sun at Solar Maximum |
5 x 10-6 |
2 |
5 x 1027 |
Peres et al. (2000, ApJ, 528, 537) |
|
Sun at Solar Minimum |
5 x 10-6 |
0.1 |
3 x 1026 |
Peres et al. (2000, ApJ, 528, 537) |
|
GRB 100621A |
1.6 x 109 |
3 x 10-6 = 125 Crab |
3 x 1051 (if energy were emitted isotropically) |
Gamma-Ray Burst |
|
A 0620-00 |
870. |
1 x 10-6 = 42 Crab |
1 x 1038 |
SXT: X-Ray Nova Mon 1975 |
|
Cen X-4 |
1200. |
1 x 10-6 = 42 Crab |
3 x 1038 |
SXT: X-Ray Nova Cen 1969 |
|
V404 Cyg |
3500. |
6 x 10-7 = 25 Crab |
1 x 1039 |
SXT: X-Ray Nova Cyg 1989 |
|
Sgr A* (Milky Way Nucleus) See note below |
8500. |
4 x 10-7 = 17 Crab |
3 x 1039 |
Inferred flux of super-massive black hole before ~1900 CE (Terrier et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, 143) |
|
GS 1354-64 |
10000. |
3 x 10-7 = 12 Crab |
4 x 1039 |
SXT: X-Ray Nova Cen 1967 |
|
4U 1543-47 |
4000. |
2 x 10-7 = 8 Crab |
7 x 1038 |
Low-Mass X-Ray Binary in outburst |
|
Sco X-1 |
2800. |
2 x 10-7 = 8 Crab |
2 x 1038 |
Low-Mass X-Ray Binary |
|
QZ Vul |
2000. |
2 x 10-7 = 8 Crab |
4 x 1038 |
SXT: X-Ray Nova Vul 1988 |
|
GRS 1716-249 |
2400. |
2 x 10-7 = 8 Crab |
2 x 1038 |
SXT: X-Ray Nova Oph 1993 |
|
GU Mus |
5500. |
2 x 10-7 = 8 Crab |
7 x 1038 |
SXT: Nova Mus 1991 |
|
Other Galactic Sources |
Distance (parsecs) |
X-ray flux (erg/s/cm2) |
X-ray Luminosity (erg/s) |
Other Name or Comment |
|
EV Lac@ |
5.1 |
5 x 10-8 = 2 Crab |
1.6 x 1032 |
dMe Flare Star (Osten et . 2010, ApJ, 721, 785) |
|
Crab SNR |
2000. |
2.4 x 10-8 = 1 Crab (duh!) |
1.2 x 1037 |
Supernova Remnant, Pulsar Wind Nebula and Pulsar |
|
II Peg@ |
42. |
1 x 10-8 = 417 milliCrab |
2 x 1033 |
RS CVn Binary (Osten et . 2007, ApJ, 654, 1052) |
|
HR 1099@ |
29. |
4 x 10-9 = 167 milliCrab |
4 x 1032 |
RS CVn Binary |
|
AB Dor@ |
10. |
4 x 10-9 = 167 milliCrab |
1 x 1032 |
Active Young Star |
|
Algol@ |
28. |
3 x 10-9 = 125 milliCrab |
3 x 1032 |
Active Binary |
|
TWA-7@ |
55. |
2 x 10-9 = 83 milliCrab |
1 x 1033 |
Pre-Main Sequence Star (Morii et al. 2010, ATel. 2836) |
|
Eta Car (Just before periastron) |
2300. |
3 x 10-10 = 12 milliCrab |
2 x 1035 |
Interacting Wind Binary |
|
Capella |
13. |
1 x 10-10 = 4 milliCrab |
2 x 1030 |
Wide Pair of Normal Stars |
|
SS Cyg@ |
75. |
5 x 10-11 = 2 milliCrab |
3 x 1031 |
Cataclysmic Binary |
|
Other Extragalactic Sources |
Distance (parsecs) |
X-ray flux (erg/s/cm2) |
X-ray Luminosity (erg/s) |
Other Name or Comment |
|
Perseus Cluster |
110 x 106 |
1 x 10-9 = 42 milliCrab |
1 x 1045 |
Cluster of Galaxies |
|
Messier 87 |
22 x 106 |
5 x 10-10 = 21 MilliCrab |
3 x 1043 |
Active Galaxy |
|
3C 273 |
750 x 106 |
2 x 10-10 = 8 milliCrab |
1 x 1046 |
Radio-Loud Quasar |
|
Messier 31 |
0.7 x 106 |
7 x 10-11 = 3 milliCrab |
4 x 1039 |
Normal Galaxy |
Note: The Galactic Center source Sgr A* currently has a weak X-ray flux only a millionth of the quoted level, but, based on the observed fading X-ray fluorescence and hard X-ray emission from giant molecular clouds in the Galactic Center, Terrier, Sunyaev and others have argued that, a hundred or more years ago, Sgr A* must have been emitting at this extremely high level.
How do the sensitivity and angular resolution of current X-ray telescopes compare with those of earlier instruments?
The earliest X-ray detectors were wide-angle instruments that had either no or limited (degrees scale) angular resolution. The first fully imaging X-ray telescope put into space was the Einstein (HEAO-2) Observatory, launched in 1978, which had instruments with angular resolution as good as 2 arcseconds (the High Resolution Imager) up to 60 arcseconds (the Imaging Proportional Counter): the ROSAT Observatory which operated during the 1990s had instruments with similar capabilities. The currently operating Chandra X-ray Observatory (launched in 1999) has a mirror which is figured to such an exquisite accuracy that its resolution is about 0.5 arcseconds (3600 arcseconds = 1 degree). Thus, in the 40 years of cosmic X-ray astronomy, the angular resolution has improved by a factor of more than 10,000 in linear scale, equivalent to an improvement of 108 in area on the sky. The latter measure is crucially important when looking for counterparts to X-ray sources in other wavelength regions, since the smaller the sky area to be searched, the smaller the chance of a misidentification with an unrelated object.
Web page author and maintainer: Stephen A. Drake